Відео

the host did a great job and asked relevant questions !

A great man, a sad loss, someone who was not afraid to challenge the narrative, someone who gave my wife and I the inspiration to remove our children from the mainstream replacing it with a 'Self Managed Learning' College without the confines of the curriculum or age order, someone who's wisdom has rewarded us with confident, happy, critical thinking, well rounded, peer pressure free kids. Eternally grateful 🙏🏼 rest in peace

short-circuit to self-transforming mind: debilitating chronic depression

Overall, masculinity is generally about being better, stronger, more independent, more achieving than women, and controlling women. Men's identity in this society is around squashing the identity of the other half of the population, as they fight to be those things. (And to squash down great bits of themselves, and to neglect the development of their emotional intelligence.) That's not their fault, but THIS is why men are the constant target of the need to change. Because we can't do it without you. Most men and women are totally miserable as a result of this system because they are both caged. Aside from women's -- overall -- lower capacity for physical strength, we both have the same level of intelligence, and a wide variation of natural traits that are valuable even when they're not traditionally masculine. Most healthy decent people would agree, I hope. Many men DO want women to be more assertive, higher achieving, capable etc. They usually just don't realise that the way they're expected to live is EXACTLY why women aren't being those things in anything like the numbers they would be if there was a space for them to do it in. Women's socialisation is just as insidious and as powerful as men's, and we are taught in every possible way to believe we are less at every turn. It is systematically enforced. Often it's like we forget just how much that affects people's personalities and achievements. What's the answer? equality. If this could start to be achieved, both women AND men's true potential would flourish. We could help you carry the load in traditional work settings, and you could help in the home. Or we could both more freely choose to do what the hell we want, whilst still caring about others. It doesn't make sense that men and women are socialised to fundamentally misunderstand and actively repel each other. IMO that's just a very illogical system which lowers happiness and stops humans flourishing.

Techno-dystopia future God help us

Tied to blockchain tech ,digital ID &social impact bonds & highly dense wireless tech Welcome to future dystopia

What a great talk

Never yet been stiffed by an ape selling bogus products Seems only God gave humans the abilities to perform Evil Our choice is do better or become as bent as Satan?

it's crazy how many people who study war would be quite happy to tell others what to do in it but would not be able to handle REAL conflict suddenly kicking off in that room or in their actual lives in a way THEY Had to face the danger

Of course it's not a socialist conspiracy... but Marx already talked about this more than a hundred years ago, when he described alienation and human nature. 😉

5:45 This is what you're looking for. This comment is for me, when I inevitably look for the autonomy at work example.

The truth and fact are that following the advent of Industrial Revolution and its results in the downside of the farming industry which increased the productivity of food production, which carry out many people in service jobs but for some just to occupy time and give enough salary to live 😊

🤍🤍🤍

Nonpareil.

Empathy is emotional Sympathy is mental

Well done. Excellent. ✨🕊️

Everything discussed in this video has gotten significantly worse in intervening years. Democrats and Republicans are lost, and the fringe parties are even more disconnected from reality. They all need to go if we're to have any hope for making it through the enxt few decades whole.

What a great thinker. Such a loss.

3:36 The law should be clear, accessible, and intelligent. 5:25 We should be governed by law and not discretion. 6:15 Everyone is equal before the law. 6:58 The exercise of public power should be exercised by those on whom they are conferred reasonably, fairly, honestly, and for the purpose for which they are conferred. 8:02 Dispute resolution. 11:07 The state should provide a fair trial. 13:20 The state should comply with its duty in international law as it should with its duty in national law.

Nice one

La empatia es el apoyo que le podemos dar al projimo.

Baron-Cohen discussed the rhesus monkey experiment, but the graphic showed chimpanzees, which are not monkeys at all. 🤔

Building t the capacity to care without getting hurt should be considered a special skill because otherwise you may end up burnout. This is something caregivers deal with and can cause them to die even sooner than their clients.

👄𓂸🤚💦🍆🧴🧻

It drives me crazy that this video gets the difference between sympathy and empathy so wrong. Apathy - lacking feeling or emotion, an unwillingness or inability to connect emotionally. Empathy - being sensitive to and vicariously experiencing the thoughts and feelings of others. Sympathy - act or capacity of entering into or sharing feelings of others. What she describes as empathy is a combination of empathy and sympathy. What she describes as sympathy is most closely related to apathy. The distinction between empathy and sympathy is shared experience. If you’re empathetic then you haven’t experienced what they’re going through, but you’re willing to meet them where they’re at. If you’re sympathetic then you’re able to connect with them because you’ve had the same or a similar experience. They’re both good things, I don’t understand how she could have gotten this so wrong.

The guys in the comments freaking out 😅. Ladies, go. For. It! 🎉

15:00

Most impressive

prick

Empathy... Feel..be connected

I don’t like to regard everything Brené Brown says as truth but whenever I am in a situation and I am about to say “at least” I think of this video and don’t say it 😅 I think of it every time, even in hypothetical situations.

Excellent as always.

I often watch Welby and Gumbel on you tube and still reach or the bucket.

Not sure that the Minister of State for GB News is qualified to talk about the creative sector……..

Now THIS is a scientist.

Nailed it sir..Kinda like our reaction to Covid..Bravo, thanks for stating the obvious..

❤❤❤❤❤ 🍆🍑💦😩😫👏𓀐𓂸𓀐𓂸𓀐𓂸💦🍆🧴🧻

An hour ago , I was concluding that u have excited me that I have a headache.

Democracy is when those who make decisions on your behalf have the duty to ask for your consent first. Today's republics are actually modern oligarchies where the interest groups of the rich are arbitrated by the people, that is, you can choose from which table of the rich you will receive crumbs. The "fatigue" of democracy occurs when there is a big difference between the interests of the elected and the voters, thus people lose confidence in the way society functions. As a result, poor and desperate citizens will vote with whoever promises them a lifeline, i.e. populists or demagogues. The democratic aspect is a collateral effect in societies where the economy has a strong competitive aspect, that is, the interests of those who hold the economic power in society are divergent. Thus those whealty, and implicitly with political power in society, supervise each other so that none of them have undeserved advantages due to politics. For this reason, countries where mineral resources have an important weight in GDP are not democratic (Russia, Venezuela, etc.), because a small group of people can exploit these resources in their own interest. In poor countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, etc.) the main exploited resource may even be the state budget, as they have convergent interests in benefiting, in their own interest, from this resource. It is easy to see if it is an oligarchy because in a true democracy laws would not be passed that would not be in the interest of the many. The first modern oligarchy appeared in England at the end of the 17th century. After the bourgeois revolution led by Cromwell succeeded, the interest groups of the rich were unable to agree on how to divide their political power in order not to reach the dictatorship of one. The solution was to appoint a king to be the arbiter. In republics, the people are the arbiter, but let's not confuse the possibility of choosing which group will govern you with democracy, that is, with the possibility of citizens deciding which laws to pass and which not to. The solution is modern direct democracy in which every citizen can vote, whenever he wants, over the head of the parliamentarian who represents him. He can even dismiss him if the majority of his voters consider that he does not correctly represent their interests. It's like when you have to build a house and you choose the site manager and the architect, but they don't have the duty to consult with you. The house will certainly not look the way you want it, but the way they want it, and it is more certain that you will be left with the money given and without the house. It is strange that outside of the political sphere, nowhere, in any economic or sports activity, will you find someone elected to a leadership position and who has failure after failure and is fired only after 4 years. We, the voters, must be consulted about the decisions and if they have negative effects we can dismiss them at any time, let's not wait for the soroco to be fulfilled, because we pay, not them. In any company, the management team comes up with a plan approved by the shareholders. Any change in this plan must be re-approved by the shareholders and it is normal because the shareholders pay.

The English war-mongering profiteers can afford to send billions to Ukranian Nazis but not to the British people themselves - time to hold these criminals to account.

Capitalism profits by selling illusions and stupifying the young - the real price comes later - because the very nature of capitalism is NOT truth, competiton, freedom or democracy or human well-being - Capitalism is an animalistic system, dog-eat-dog reality that ALWAYS leads to monopolistic abuse, corruption and war. Capitalism INCENTIVIZES greed, theft, deceit, corruption, and violence. It ALWAYS leads to alienation, political corruption, embezzlement, psychological trauma and suicide. For example, the greatest numbers of mass shootings happens to take place in the greatest capitalist nation - the USA - and not surprisingly it is also the greatest exporter of violence around the world.

How to look like an egg

LGBT communities around the world still have many things to dissent in nowadays rules. Moral-structured-religious-schemas still prevailing over law and decency. Being just a common old-styled-heterosexual can't deny the truth: that's deeply unfair.

Great illustration if great Sir Ken Robinson (R.I.P.🙏)

Loved the watercolours. About feelings and sensations: sometimes everything comes to this. Even in hard times. Some colours in his work suggest me codes.

This guy is a perfect example of the kind of arrogant idiots that infest academia.

Something about this gentleman screams mi6. The accent, the PERFECT cover, the fact he has been everywhere that the British military have conducted special operations. Worth remembering that military intelligence has a propaganda component too. The sad thing is, that despite this extrememely well educated gentleman talking to a room of equally well educated people, the enormous risk of uncontrolable escalation between NATO and Russia is never mentioned.

👏 👏 👏 👏 I find this effort to be extremely important, although very incomplete due to merely emerging… I’m sorry to see very small arrendende of your material by the public😢 You need to address this in the face of COUNTDOWN2045 ASAP. I came to your channel through animation of old TEDtalk by Dr. McGilchrist on divided brain. This visual mode of narrative makes complex issues more accessible to majority of visually oriented learners with the habits that support the lacking auditory learning proficiency, due to lacking abstract cognition among majority at this time, sadly.

Watching it one feels and thinks out of the box. As a teacher, I have always valued the creativity of a student. This video has added reasons.

How is this a negative is what I don’t understand? You can sit all day and exert zero energy and minimum stress. That sounds like a good job to me. You go home more happy, you’re probably paid very well to live off it, and you just clock and clock out with no one looking over your shoulder. Those all sound like positives to the people who are on the opposite end. I hear people complaining about micro management, spending extra hours at work to be busy for no reason, and work being extremely stressful that the only thing you want to do when you get home is sleep, even causing some homes to end in divorce. Please explain how a career like that could be bad for my mental health.